Serum titer of neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination in Japanese patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Vaccination is an important strategy to reduce the infection rate and adverse events of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the effect of COVID-19 vaccination for Japanese patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been fully elucidated. In the present study, we investigated the serum titer of neutralizing antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IBD, treated with and without immunosuppressive therapy. The study consisted of 108 patients with IBD [76 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 32 with Crohn's disease (CD)] from the gastroenterology outpatient clinic at the Hospital of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine who underwent anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. The control group included 64 healthy subjects who received the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. When 10 AU/ml of neutralizing antibodies was used as cut-off value, the positive rates of neutralizing antibodies of patients with UC, patients with DC, and the control group were 97.3%, 84.3%, and 100%, respectively. The neutralizing antibody titer showed no difference between patients treated with and without immunosuppressive therapy. These results indicate that COVID-19 vaccination may be useful in patients with IBD, treated with or without immunosuppressive therapy.

Impact of Treatment with Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody on the Production of Neutralizing Antibody Against Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Mature B-Cell Neoplasms.

Background and Purpose: Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), rituximab (RIT), and obinutuzumab (OBZ) are the central components of immunochemotherapy for B-cell lymphoma (BCL). However, these agents potentially cause B-cell depletion, resulting in the impairment of antibody (Ab) production. During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, the optimal prediction of Ab response against anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is critically important in patients with BCL treated by B-cell depletion therapeutics to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients and Methods:  We investigated the effect of using RIT and/or OBZ on the Ab response in 131 patients with various types of BCL who received the second SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine either after, during, or before immunochemotherapy containing B-cell-depleting moiety between June and November 2021 at seven institutes belonging to the Kyoto Clinical Hematology Study Group. The SARS-Cov-2 neutralizing Ab (nAb) was measured from 14 to 207 days after the second vaccination dose using the iFlash3000 automatic analyzer and the iFlash-2019-nCoV Nab kit. Results: Among 86 patients who received the vaccine within 12 months after B-cell depletion therapy, 8 (9.3%) were seropositive. In 30 patients who received the vaccine after 12 months from B-cell depletion therapy, 22 (73%) were seropositive. In 15 patients who were subjected to B-cell depletion therapy after vaccination, 2 (13%) were seropositive. The multivariate analysis indicated that an interval of 12 months between B-cell depletion therapy and the subsequent vaccination was significantly associated with effective Ab production. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified the optimal threshold period after anti-CD20 MoAb treatment, which determines the seropositivity against SARS-CoV-2, to be 342 days. Conclusion: The use of anti-CD20 MoAb within 12 months before vaccination is a critical risk for poor Ab response against anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with BCL.

Clinical Implication of the Effect of the Production of Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-Cov-2 for Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia Flare-Up Associated with COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and the Review of Literature.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the appropriate production of serum anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) neutralizing antibody (nAb) plays a critical role in the recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the role of nAb production in the recovery from a flare-up of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) has been unknown. We here report the first retrospectively investigated case of serum anti-SARS-Cov-2 nAb production during chronic ITP flare-up triggered by COVID-19. A 79-year-old woman with a history of corticosteroid-refractory ITP visited our hospital complaining of fever, cough, and sore throat for 4 days. Although chronic ITP was controlled by 12.5 mg of eltrombopag (EPAG) every other day, laboratory tests showed a decreased peripheral blood platelet count of 15.0 × 109/L, which indicated worsening thrombocytopenia. Meanwhile, PCR testing of a nasopharyngeal swab revealed that the patient was positive for SARS-Cov-2, and a computed tomography scan revealed bilateral pneumonia. On the basis of the flare-up of chronic ITP associated with COVID-19 pneumonia which was determined as a moderately severe status according to the WHO clinical progression scale, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for 5 days (days 0-4) and antiviral therapy were added on top of EPAG, which only resulted in a transient increase in the platelet count for several days. After decreasing to 8.0 × 109/L on day 13, the platelet count increased from day 16, coinciding with a positive detection for serum nAb against SARS-Cov-2. Although the increased dose up to 50 mg/day of EPAG was challenged during the clinical course, rapid dose reduction did not cause another relapse. In addition, no thrombotic or bleeding event was seen. These collectively suggest the vital role of the production of anti-SARS-Cov-2 nAb and improvement of clinical symptoms for recovery from a flare-up of chronic ITP in our case.

An engineered ACE2 decoy neutralizes the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and confers protection against infection in vivo.

The Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant contains an unusually high number of mutations in the spike protein, raising concerns of escape from vaccines, convalescent serum, and therapeutic drugs. Here, we analyzed the degree to which Omicron pseudo-virus evades neutralization by serum or therapeutic antibodies. Serum samples obtained 3 months after two doses of BNT162b2 vaccination exhibited 18-fold lower neutralization titers against Omicron than parental virus. Convalescent serum samples from individuals infected with the Alpha and Delta variants allowed similar frequencies of Omicron breakthrough infections. Domain-wise analysis using chimeric spike proteins revealed that this efficient evasion was primarily achieved by mutations clustered in the receptor binding domain but that multiple mutations in the N-terminal domain contributed as well. Omicron escaped a therapeutic cocktail of imdevimab and casirivimab, whereas sotrovimab, which targets a conserved region to avoid viral mutation, remains effective. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) decoys are another virus-neutralizing drug modality that are free, at least in theory, from complete escape. Deep mutational analysis demonstrated that an engineered ACE2 molecule prevented escape for each single-residue mutation in the receptor binding domain, similar to immunized serum. Engineered ACE2 neutralized Omicron comparably to the Wuhan strain and also showed a therapeutic effect against Omicron infection in hamsters and human ACE2 transgenic mice. Similar to previous SARS-CoV-2 variants, some sarbecoviruses showed high sensitivity against engineered ACE2, confirming the therapeutic value against diverse variants, including those that are yet to emerge.